Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 01:51

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Despite practicing at CB and WR, Bo Melton won’t compare himself to Travis Hunter - NBC Sports
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Proposed NASA cuts to space science: “Staggering” - EarthSky
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Android 16 QPR1 Beta 2 redesigns viewed notifications, now transparent - 9to5Google
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Does turmeric help fight cancer? If so, how?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How can someone feel more FTM when AMAB?
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What have you learned from your parents' mistakes?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Security Camera Footage Reveals How Dog Puts Away His Toys After Playing - AOL.com